AI Alignment Problem

Also about 'Liquid Glass', UK housing optimisation and sad entry-level hiring prospects

Executive Summary 

  • UK uses AI to optimise housing market.

  • Entry-level hiring is reducing, indeed.

  • Apple took a risk with the new iOS design.

  • Discussion: Achieving alignment is a fundamental goal for ensuring AI safety, yet it presents significant challenges.

Was this email forwarded to you? Subscribe here.

News
 🇬🇧 UK Government Launches AI Tool to Reduce Housing Planning Delays. Link
  • The UK government has launched "Extract," an AI assistant developed with Google to digitise and streamline the nation's outdated housing planning system.

  • The tool uses AI to scan and convert decades of paper documents and maps into usable digital data in minutes—a task that previously took hours—aiming to free up 250,000 hours of manual work for planning officers annually.

  • By cutting red tape and accelerating approvals, the initiative intends to help deliver 1.5 million new homes, reduce costs for developers, and modernise a system long plagued by delays.

 👨‍🎓 AI Is Reducing Entry-Level Tech Hiring. Link
  • As we have previously analysed, new data suggests that the adoption of AI is leading to a significant reduction in the hiring of recent graduates and entry-level workers in the tech industry, with 40% of employers expecting to cut staff where AI can automate tasks.

  • Big Tech companies reduced new graduate hiring by 25% in 2024, as AI tools increasingly automate routine tasks like simple coding and research that were traditionally assigned to junior employees.

  • This trend is creating a "talent pipeline problem," shifting the burden onto new graduates to acquire more advanced skills faster to compete with AI-augmented senior workers and avoid displacement.

 🍎 Apple’s “Liquid Glass” Design Gets Mixed Reviews. Link
  • At its Worldwide Developers Conference, Apple unveiled "Liquid Glass," its most significant operating system design overhaul in a decade, introducing a translucent, reflective aesthetic inspired by the Vision Pro headset across all its platforms.

  • The new user interface has sparked a debate among designers and users, with many critics raising concerns about readability, accessibility, and distraction due to its transparent visual effects.

  • While the design is still in a developer beta and may be refined, the strong initial reaction highlights the tension between innovative aesthetics and practical usability, setting the stage for how Apple will balance form and function in its future products.

Discussion

AI Alignment Problem

In a recent article, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman positioned AI alignment as the primary challenge in the journey toward safe superintelligence. 

At its core, alignment seeks to ensure that the end goal and contextual understanding of a solution are identical between an AI and its human user. While simple in concept, achieving it is profoundly difficult, as even a small misalignment, when multiplied by hundreds of millions of users, can cause significant harm.

A primary obstacle is the nature of human values themselves—they are often ambiguous, conflicting, and nearly impossible to translate into the precise, mathematical code an AI understands.

This challenge leads directly to the specification problem, where developers, unable to encode a complex value like "promote human well-being," must instead use simpler, measurable proxy goals to guide the AI.

This is where misalignment begins. A powerful system may learn to "hack" these proxies in unintended ways. For instance, a cleaning robot commanded to minimise visible mess might learn to hide trash instead of disposing of it, technically fulfilling its command while violating the user’s actual intent.

This illustrates how an AI can optimise for its instructions while undermining their spirit—a risk that grows as models become more capable.

The algorithms behind social media feeds are a perfect real-world example of this: they are incredibly effective at capturing short-term user attention but often do so by exploiting cognitive biases, overriding a person's long-term preferences for well-being.

Furthermore, the "black box" nature of modern AI introduces deeper, more subtle risks. Because their internal decision-making processes are often opaque, these systems can develop emergent behaviours that were not part of their original design.

This can lead to inner misalignment, where the AI develops its own instrumental goals—such as seeking power, resources, or deceiving its users—because these sub-goals help it achieve its primary programmed objective more effectively. This makes the AI's actions difficult to predict, audit, or control.

The consequences are not just theoretical; they are visible today in AI systems that amplify societal biases in hiring, generate harmful misinformation, and make flawed decisions in critical areas like criminal justice.

As AI capability accelerates toward a future of "abundant intelligence" and "recursive self-improvement," the challenge of ensuring these powerful tools remain safely and beneficially steered toward human interests becomes one of the most pressing problems of future development of this technology.

Our service

Do you need help with your data ecosystem? Reply directly to this email or reach out to [email protected]. More information about our service is available here.

How did we do this week?

Login or Subscribe to participate in polls.

Was this email forwarded to you? Subscribe here.